Skip to main content


Nah then, Freddy: look wh' y' gowin, deah. […] Theres menners f' yer! Te-oo banches o voylets trod into the mad. […] Ow, eez ye-ooa san, is e? Wal, fewd dan y' de-ooty bawmz a mather should, eed now bettern to spawl a pore gel's flahrzn than ran awy athaht pyin. Will ye-oo py me f'them? 
(Eliza Doolittle in Pygmalion, Act I, George Bernard Shaw, 1912)
Forget boxsets -- after-dinner read-throughs are the height of domestic entertainment. The latest production chez Whitnall was George Bernard Shaw's Pygmalion (named after the sculptor from Greek mythology whose most beautiful statue awakens to life). In the play, a Professor of phonetics, Henry Higgins, accepts a bet to inculcate 'common', comically Cockney flower girl Eliza Doolittle with such refined speech and deportment that she is able to pass for a duchess in upper-class society. [1] As forewarned by his mother and his housekeeper, the success of this undertaking lands Eliza in something of a fix ...
LIZA [pulling herself together in desperation] What am I fit for? What have you left me fit for? Where am I to go? What am I to do? What's to become of me?
HIGGINS [a genial afterthought occurring to him] I daresay my mother could find some chap or other who would do very well.
LIZA. We were above that at the corner of Tottenham Court Road.
HIGGINS [waking up] What do you mean?
LIZA. I sold flowers. I didn't sell myself. Now you've made a lady of me I'm not fit to sell anything else. I wish you'd left me where you found me.
HIGGINS. [slinging the core of the apple decisively into the grate] Tosh, Eliza. Don't you insult human relations by dragging all this cant about buying and selling into it. You needn't marry the fellow if you don't like him.
LIZA. What else am I to do? 
(Pygmalion, Act III, George Bernard Shaw, 1912) 
Her elegance and accent estrange her from the world that she grew up in; her lack of aristocratic credentials and, more importantly, a sense of dignity which balks at the idea of marriage as a means of livelihood, greatly constrict her options in the world to which she now superficially belongs. Henry -- self-satisfied, and relieved that the project (too easy not to have become tiresome) is finally over -- maintains a sort of vaguely affectionate nonchalance towards Eliza; he neither sees nor particularly cares what all the fuss is about, to her escalating indignation. [2]

"Why have you made me like this?" -- It is a bewailment that I can relate to. So much would be ... easier, if only I was ... otherwise. I didn't ask to be this way; I didn't ask to be at all! (At least, not as far as I remember or understand, but then ... who knows? it's certainly a thing to ponder.)

As prayers go, it's not a very wise one...
But who are you, O man, to answer back to God? Will what is molded say to its molder, “Why have you made me like this?” (Romans 9:20)
“Woe to him who strives with him who formed him,
a pot among earthen pots!
Does the clay say to him who forms it, ‘What are you making?’
or ‘Your work has no handles’? (Isaiah 45:9)
"But..." I want to argue... "a pot doesn't have a mouth. (Well, it sort of has a mouth, but definitely not a larynx). Nor reason. It can't wonder, and it can't question. I have the facility and the temptation to do both. Why? On top of everything else about my creation and existence that I want to but am not allowed to question, why the ability to do that very questioning I'm not allowed to do? Wouldn't it all be so much easier if I just, well, if I couldn't..." Hmmm.

I don't know the answer. The question is a bigger one than it seemed when I first sulkily tendered it. Why are humans like we are? Why is anything like it is? Why suffering? Why free will? Whether free will? How? and what? and really?!
Then the LORD answered Job out of the whirlwind and said:
“Who is this that darkens counsel by words without knowledge?
Dress for action like a man;
I will question you, and you make it known to me.
“Where were you when I laid the foundation of the earth?
Tell me, if you have understanding.
Who determined its measurements—surely you know!
Or who stretched the line upon it?
On what were its bases sunk,
or who laid its cornerstone [...]" (Job 38:1-6)
Learning to live with not knowing, not understanding ... as well as being appropriately humble, it's kinda ... well ... necessary, pragmatically speaking. Sometimes there's answers. Sometimes there's a wise and clever thing to say that makes it all seem neat and tidy and OK. Sometimes something circumstantial changes and the questions no longer seem so urgent. But sometimes, in the words of Eliza, everything's "Ah—ah—ah—ow—ow—ow—oo!" and there's nothing much more to be said.

It is those moments which most acutely reveal our need for an entirely different type of understanding ... "that you, being rooted and grounded in love, may have strength to comprehend with all the saints what is the breadth and length and height and depth, and to know the love of Christ that surpasses knowledge, that you may be filled with all the fullness of God." (Ephesians 3:17b-19)

[1] It was great fun to read, with the downside that just as I began to triumph in a Cockney accent worthy of my East London roots I was forced to abandon it again for an exaggerated version of what Mr. W disparagingly calls my 'telephone voice'...

[2] The arrangement that is eventually made for her future -- with the involvement of Higgins' straight-talking mother, and his gentlemanly friend Pickering, and an enraptured, incapable suitor named Freddie -- is, well, it's delightfully and appropriately 'messy'...although, to Shaw's disgust, directors have had a tendency to tie it up, neat rom-com style, in production and adaptation.

[Thumbnail cc from LadyDragonflyCC on Flickr]


Popular posts from this blog

An autobiographical poem about walking on water

A decade ago, give or take – feeling at crisis point in my mental health and desperately socially disconnected – I "went up for prayer" at a church I was visiting. (I find it hard to do this at my own church when I feel desperately socially disconnected. It's hard enough even to be at my own church at such times). And the gentle, kindly woman who placed her hand on my shoulder and prayed some simple, general, healing words to suit my simple, general, hurting plea looked thoughtfully at me afterwards and said "just, if and when you can, keep taking each next step towards Jesus, whatever that looks like," or words to that effect. It seemed as good a plan as any, so I did. (Not instead of getting medical and professional help, I hasten to add; seeking out and receiving whatever support is available has always felt more like an action of faith than a compromise of it).

Since then, stepping towards Jesus has taken me (slowly, often painfully, and usually the long w…

The Sin of Onan

Judah got a wife for Er, his firstborn, and her name was Tamar. But Er, Judah’s firstborn, was wicked in the Lord’s sight; so the Lord put him to death. Then Judah said to Onan, “Sleep with your brother’s wife and fulfill your duty to her as a brother-in-law to raise up offspring for your brother.” But Onan knew that the child would not be his; so whenever he slept with his brother’s wife, he spilled his semen on the ground to keep from providing offspring for his brother. What he did was wicked in the Lord’s sight; so the Lord put him to death also. (Genesis 38:6-10) According to Google's answer to what (let's face it) must be right up there among the most-asked questions since the invention of the search engine, this story is the closest the Bible comes to saying anything directly about masturbation.

And it isn't a story about masturbation. It's not even a story, not really, about birth control methods – although they feature. It's a story about the denial of ju…

(Come in under the shadow of this red rock)

What are the roots that clutch, what branches grow
Out of this stony rubbish? Son of man,
You cannot say, or guess, for you know only
A heap of broken images, where the sun beats,
And the dead tree gives no shelter, the cricket no relief,
And the dry stone no sound of water. Only
There is shadow under this red rock,
(Come in under the shadow of this red rock),
And I will show you something different from either
Your shadow at morning striding behind you
Or your shadow at evening rising to meet you;
I will show you fear in a handful of dust.  (T.S. Eliot, from The Waste Land, part I: The Burial of the Dead,1922) These lines have lingered in my mind the past few days. Eliot wrote The Waste Land in the years following the First World War, when the landscape of humanity seemed perhaps particularly stark and bleak. The poem resounds with disquiet and despair: all glimpsed respite turns out to be illusory or faltering; it seems improbable that any grounds for real hope exist at all. Eliot …